Showing 1 - 10 of 39
A growing body of literature suggests that courts and juries are inclined toward division of liability between two strictly non-negligent or “vigilant” parties. However, standard models of liability rules do not provide for vigilance-based sharing of liability. In this paper, we explore the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003728417
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003781240
In this paper we discuss a new tort liability rule, which we call super-symmetric comparative negligence and vigilance. When both injurer and victim in an accident are negligent, it provides for liability shares that depend on the degrees of negligence of the two parties, similar to the standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003809320
A growing body of literature suggests that courts and juries are inclined toward division of liability between two strictly non-negligent or vigilant parties. However, standard models of liability rules do not provide for vigilance-based sharing of liability. In this paper, we explore the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012724101
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012533233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014375194
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013359206
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000077656
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011504520
This paper develops two straightforward value of life models; one is a probabilistic value of life model and the second is a determinstic value of time model. Simplifying assumptions allow both models to be solved analytically. Constant relative risk aversion utility functions are used, and both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011504533