Showing 1 - 10 of 1,142
Several studies show cases where the Samuelson rule holds, or where the marginal cost of public funds (MCF) equals one within optimized tax systems. The conditions for the original Samuelson rule to hold in these studies are quite restrictive, and MCF measures employed are not consistent with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012194938
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003392272
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001740363
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009670399
There still seems to be some confusion about the consequences of normalisations in the optimal taxation literature. We claim that:1) Normalisations do not matter for the real solution of optimal taxation problem.2) Normalisations do matter for good characterisations of the solutions to optimal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011509431
Recent estimates of the marginal cost of public funds differ substantially. Some studies argue that the efficiency cost of taxation counter the welfare gain connected to redistribution of income. Hence, the efficiency cost of taxation should not be included as a cost of public goods provision....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011411484
The paper shows that the marginal cost of public funds (MCF) does not depend on whether public revenue is collected by taxation of consumer goods or income from factors supplied by households on the market. Atkinson and Stern (1974) concluded in their seminal paper that “[...] whether the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012437901
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012498714
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011576721
Using information on desired and actual hours of work, we formulate a discrete choice model of constrained labor supply. Using the German Socio-Economic Panel and the microsimulation model STSM, we find that hours and participation elasticities are substantially smaller than those in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012023402