Showing 1 - 10 of 155
From the perspective of standard public good theory the total amount of greenhouse gas mitigation (or public good supply in general) will be lower in a leader-follower game than in a simultaneous Nash game so that strategic leadership is disadvantageous for climate policy. We show that this need...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011610917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011979119
From the perspective of standard public good theory the total amount of greenhouse gas mitigation (or public good supply in general) will be lower in a leader-follower game than in a simultaneous Nash game so that strategic leadership is disadvantageous for climate policy. We show that this need...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012960481
We explore how leadership affects a dynamic public goods game. Using an experimental setting where cooperation gains can be reinvested, our findings suggest that leadership has a positive impact on final wealth of the groups. Additionally, we also observe that leadership has a positive effect on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012897774
This review aims at exploring main results of leading-by-example in public goods experiments. Based on a systematic literature analysis, I examine whether leadership increases contributions to a public good. Moreover, I outline factors that foster or impede leadership success. To understand how...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012864255
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003392709
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011377670
Under conditions of risk it makes a difference whether the discount rate is determined as an expected present or as an expected future value. This difference which is dubbed as the Weitzman-Gollier puzzle has stimulated an intensive discussion which, however, is somewhat confusing. In this paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010412052
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003202150
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001834217