Showing 1 - 10 of 6,401
Banks face two different kinds of moral hazard problems: asset substitution by shareholders (e.g., making risky, negative net present value loans) and managerial rent seeking (e.g., investing in inefficient “pet” projects and consuming perquisites that yield private benefits). The privately...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008657183
We analyze shareholders' incentives to change the leverage of a firm that has already borrowed substantially. As a result of debt overhang, shareholders have incentives to resist reductions in leverage that make the remaining debt safer. This resistance is present even without any government...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009528814
This paper proposes a new regulatory approach that implements capital requirements contingent on managerial compensation. We argue that excessive risk taking in the financial sector originates from the shareholder moral hazard created by government guarantees rather than from corporate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010226049
We develop a model of the joint capital structure decisions of banks and their borrowers. Strikingly high bank leverage emerges naturally from the interplay between two sets of forces. First, seniority and diversification reduce bank asset volatility by an order of magnitude relative to that of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010259793
This paper proposes a new regulatory approach that implements capital requirements contingent on executive incentive schemes. We argue that excessive risk-taking in the financial sector originates from the shareholder moral hazard created by government guarantees rather than from corporate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011539591
We investigate the effect of managerial incentives and market power on bank risk-taking for a sample of 212 large US bank holding companies over 1997-2004 (i.e. 1,534 observations). Bank managers have incentives to prefer less risk while bank shareholders have preference for ‘excessive' risk....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013133995
We show that provision of public liquidity has real consequences for firms. Comparing A-1 rated non-financial commercial paper issuers using Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF) eligibility criteria, we show that firms with access to the CPFF were able to mitigate financing disruptions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013116976
This article analyzes the manifold situations in which the efficient-market hypothesis (EMH) has influenced — or has failed to influence — federal securities regulation and state corporate law, and the prospective roles for the EMH in these contexts. In federal securities regulation, the EMH...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013100915
This research investigates the real effects of public liquidity provision. Using the Commercial Paper Funding Facility's (CPFF) eligibility criteria for non-financial commercial paper issuers as the identification strategy, we show that firms with access to the CPFF were able to mitigate the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091356
We investigate the effects of managerial incentives and market power on bank risk-taking for a sample of 212 large U.S. bank holding companies over the period 1997-2004 (comprising 1,534 observations). Bank managers have incentives to prefer less risk, while bank shareholders prefer higher risk,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013092614