Showing 1 - 10 of 6,221
In this paper we investigate the negative relationship between analysts' coverage and stocks idiosyncratic volatility. While prior research argues that analysts cause the low level of idiosyncratic risk because they lack access to firm-specific information we hypothesize that the causal relation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013004785
In this paper we investigate the endogeneity of analysts' coverage decision. Specifically we argue that due to reputational concerns analysts avoid covering stocks with high levels of specific risk. Using three novel quasi-natural experiments we show that analysts' coverage drops after an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013044607
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000785140
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003691216
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009575825
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011283637
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009759181
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010231048
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010465273
Using a value-weighted rather than an equally weighted regression, Easton and Sommers (2007) show that the upward bias in the risk premium implied by analysts' earnings forecasts falls to 1.6%, but remains statistically and economically significant. In this paper, we argue that any estimation of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013128708