Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Judgment (or logical) aggregation theory is logically more powerful than social choice theory and has been put to use to recover some classic results of this field. Whether it could also enrich it with genuinely new results is still controversial. To support a positive answer, we prove a social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010501384
This handbook chapter covers the existing theoretical literature on social preference and social welfare under risk (i.e., when probability values enter the data of the situation) and uncertainty (i.e., when this is not the case and only subjective probability assessments can be formed). Section...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010504022
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010484206
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001756528
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011585101
Judgment aggregation theory generalizes social choice theory by having the aggregation rule bear on judgments of all kinds instead of barely judgments of preference. The paper briefly sums it up, privileging the variant that formalizes judgment by a logical syntax. The theory derives from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014159484