Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009296718
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003103664
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012547874
In this paper we investigated group size impact on risk aversion when a majority rule is applied. Drawing on the widely used Holt and Laury’s (2002) lottery pairs, we observed a risky shift for both individual and groups regardless of their size. However, groups choices are shown to be closer...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011785074
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013464166
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014502508
In this paper, we first replicated Harrison et al. (2012). Then, we studied if the group's size has an impact on group's risk aversion. In line with Harrison et al. (2012), our results confirm that no significant differences occur between individuals and groups risk aversion in three-person...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011556606
Using an experiment with material incentives, this paper investigates the violation of Lorenz relations in the case of dominant and singlecrossing Lorenz curves. Our experimental design consists of two treatments: an income distribution treatment and a lottery treatment. Both treatments were...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002796352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003032857
The recent literature on individual vs. group decisions over risk has brought about divergent results, mainly depending on the institutional rules through which groups take decisions. While some studies where group decisions relied on the majority rule showed no appreciable difference between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012956112