Showing 1 - 10 of 20
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012022865
This paper proposes a geometric delineation of distributional preference types and a non-parametric approach for their identification in a two-person context. It starts with a small set of assumptions on preferences and shows that this set (i) naturally results in a taxonomy of distributional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010191920
Credence goods markets suffer from inefficiencies arising from informational asymmetries between expert sellers and customers. While standard theory predicts that inefficiencies disappear if customers can verify the quality received, verifiability fails to yield efficiency in experiments with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003931304
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010358098
Credence goods markets suffer from inefficiencies caused by superior information of sellers about the surplus-maximizing quality. While standard theory predicts that equal mark-up prices solve the credence goods problem if customers can verify the quality received, experimental evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010479932
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009671457
Credence goods markets suffer from inefficiencies arising from informational asymmetries between expert sellers and customers. While standard theory predicts that inefficiencies disappear if customers can verify the quality received, verifiability fails to yield efficiency in experiments with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013153013
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012672095
Credence goods markets suffer from inefficiencies arising from informational asymmetries between expert sellers and customers. While standard theory predicts that inefficiencies disappear if customers can verify the quality received, verifiability fails to yield efficiency in experiments with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009736635
We study experimentally the relationship between distributional preferences and competitive behavior. We find that spiteful subjects react strongest to competitive pressure and win in a tournament significantly more often than efficiency-minded and inequality averse subjects. However, when given...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009737068