Showing 1 - 10 of 1,766
We experimentally study the impact of framing effects in a repeated sequential social dilemma game. Our between-subjects design consists of two group level ("Wall Street" vs. "Community") and two individual level ("First (Second) Movers" vs. "Leaders (Followers)") frames. We find that average...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012294775
In this paper, we report an experimental investigation of the effect of framing on social preferences, as revealed in a one-shot linear public goods game. We use two indicators to measure social preferences: self-reported emotional responses; and, as a behavioural indicator of disapproval,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003675323
In this paper, we analyse if individual inequality aversion measured with simple experimental games depends on whether the monetary endowment in these games is either a windfall gain (“house money”) or a reward for a certain effort-related performance. Moreover, we analyse whether the way of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003922993
conflicts. A first experiment shows that a between-group conflict leads to within-group cooperation and particularly individuals … second experiment reveals that prosocials' contributions to the group-specific or collective good vary as a function of the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010337030
conducted a simple experiment with people who have been involved in international climate policy. The experiment, which was run …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012726146
This paper experimentally investigates how individual preferences, through unrestricted deliberation, are aggregated into a group decision in two contexts: reciprocating gifts and choosing between lotteries. In both contexts, we find that median group members have a significant impact on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013052034
This paper experimentally investigates how individual preferences, through unrestricted deliberation, get aggregated into a group decision in two contexts: reciprocating gifts, and choosing between lotteries. In both contexts we find that median group members have a significant impact on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014038250
This paper experimentally investigates how individual preferences, through unrestricted deliberation, get aggregated into a group decision in two contexts: reciprocating gifts, and choosing between lotteries. In both contexts we find that median group members have a significant impact on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014038289
We compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both within- and between-subject experimental designs, and we investigate how teams aggregate individual preferences. We find that team decisions reveal less inequality aversion than individual initial proposals in team...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010359304
be derived from reaching a better relative position. We use a real-effort experiment in which we permit individuals to … ; experiment …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003985726