Showing 1 - 10 of 51,084
This chapter from a Practical Guide to Transfer Pricing (Lexis) compares the U.S. Section 482 transfer pricing regulations to the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations as revised in 2010. Section 482's purpose is to ensure that taxpayers subject...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014126444
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013030001
Corporate income tax law in OECD countries requires multinational enterprises (MNEs) to set their transfer prices according to the arm's length standard. In 1990, the US government introduced a transfer pricing penalty for cases where MNEs deviated substantially from this standard. Most OECD...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014027932
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000623798
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001709603
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001485983
Using unique transaction-level microdata, this paper documents profit-shifting behavior by U.S. multinational firms via the strategic transfer pricing of intra-firm trade. A simple model reveals how differences in tax rates, both the corporate tax rates across countries and the dividend...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014121187
This paper considers the treatment of multinational business in the system known as an X Tax. The focus is on the choice between origin and destination treatments of transborder transactions. The destination-principle approach sidesteps the transferpricing problem. It remains in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011450578
This paper considers the treatment of multinational business in the system known as an X Tax. The focus is on the choice between origin and destination treatments of transborder transactions. The destination-principle approach sidesteps the transferpricing problem. It remains in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002225854
The IRS's position should not be considered to conflict with the arm's length principle. The OECD countries can always hold this view against the U.S., by stating that highly valuable marketing intangibles were created in the hands of OECD distributors. Now that it has been determined that U.S....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115957