Showing 1 - 10 of 3,351
different jurisdictions: Australia, Great Britain, South Korea, and the United States. For each jurisdiction, the article …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012955867
This article examines the differing legal treatment of pre-dispute consumer arbitration agreements in the European Union and the United States. Under the E.U. Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts (particularly as implemented in the United Kingdom), most such agreements are invalid. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013122676
The Supreme Court has held that Article II’s vesting of executive power in the President, who must “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” provides the President with the power to remove most principal executive officers at will. The Court has also held that Humphrey’s Executor...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014257154
of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) does not permit direct claims, relying instead on a State …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012713250
On 13 March 2000, the statutory derivation action was introduced into Australia, effectively abolishing the rule in … Australia. The article also provides a discussion as to why statutory derivative actions in Australia will not be popular …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013037045
(UK) and Australia also citizens and permanent residents of the United States (US) who are employed overseas. In addition … to identifying specific taxation implications for residents of the UK and Australia, also citizens and permanent …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013065662
The Australia-US Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) required extensive changes to Australian copyright law. This paper … significant impact of AUSFTA's copyright provisions, however, appears to have been their impact on Australia's copyright trade … policy. Pre-AUSFTA, Australia promoted multilateral standards and mostly sought to comply with, but not exceed international …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013015968
Australia or the single regulator model employed by the United Kingdom. Opponents of consolidation, however, have argued that … United Kingdom, and Australia influenced how each nation regulated financial services prior to the crisis, (2) to what extent … Australia was able to avoid many of the problems that arose in the United States and the United Kingdom and that this was at …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013123818
In both Australia and the U.S., the tax anti-avoidance law has evolved to include two common doctrinal components. One … a more normal, Plan A course of action. Australia's Part IVA has been applied to invalidate a planning step that is part …-motivated merger and acquisition transactions generally are not vulnerable under U.S. law. In Australia, tax anti-avoidance law is …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012987226
This paper contrasts UK and US governance of M&A break fees to see what the contrast can teach us about trade-offs between litigation and regulation as modes of governance, including how laws change under each regime over time. Data on 1,136 bids in 1989-2008 and 61 fee disputes show: (1) the UK...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013150915