Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001470036
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003672449
This paper discusses allocation of burden of proof in environmental disputes in the WTO system. Besides laying down the natural principles that (i) the complainant carries the burden to (ii) make a prima facie case that its claim holds, WTO adjudicating bodies have said little of more general...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003814076
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003804280
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011499418
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001296182
Trading nations exchange tariff concessions in the context of trade liberalizing rounds. Tariffs, nonetheless, are not the only instrument affecting the value of a concession. Domestic instruments affect it as well, but public order is not negotiable, and, consequently, is not scheduled. Public...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010320089
This paper discusses allocation of burden of proof in environmental disputes in the WTO system. Besides laying down the natural principles that (i) the complainant carries the burden to (ii) make a prima facie case that its claim holds, WTO adjudicating bodies have said little of more general...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010320268
The WTO does not squarely address the issue of jurisdictional ambit of national policies (affecting trade). And yet, absent some agreement as to what trading nations can and cannot do, the WTO loses much of its effectiveness. In the absence of explicit regulation of the issue in the WTO...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014148524
This paper discusses allocation of burden of proof in environmental disputes in the WTO system. Besides laying down the natural principles that (i) the complainant carries the burden to (ii) make a prima facie case that its claim holds, WTO adjudicating bodies have said little of more general...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207636