Showing 1 - 10 of 19
This paper proposes a new panel unit root test based on Simes' [Biometrika 1986, An Improved Bonferroni Procedure for Multiple Tests of Significanceʺ] classical intersection test. The test is robust to general patterns of cross-sectional dependence and yet straightforward to implement, only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003835930
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003937116
Time series cointegration tests, even in the presence of large sample sizes, often yield conflicting conclusions ("mixed signalsʺ) as measured by, inter alia, a low correlation of empirical p-values [see Gregory et al., 2004, Journal of Applied Econometrics]. Using their methodology, we present...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394608
Meta-analytic panel unit root tests such as Fisher's X 2 test, which consist of pooling the p-values of time series unit root tests, are widely applied in practice. Recently, several Monte Carlo studies have found these tests’ Error-in-Rejection Probabilities (or, synonymously, size...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394639
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009717798
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008904998
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003391548
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel approaches also produce test statistics behaving erratically when applied to tests for PPP. We show that if appropriate tests (which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and more powerful than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394591
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008653316
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009697993