Showing 1 - 10 of 57
English fertility history is generally regarded as having been composed of two re-gimes: an era of unregulated marital fertility, from at least 1540 to 1890, then the modern era, with regulated marital fertility, lower for higher social classes. We show there were in fact three fertility regimes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008657362
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011346023
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010347494
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011494392
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013185407
Children early in the birth order get more parental care than later children. Does this significantly affect their life chances? An extensive genealogy of 428,280 English people 1680-2024, with substantial sets of complete families, suggests that birth order had little effect on social outcomes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014512834
English fertility history is generally regarded as having been composed of two regimes: an era of unregulated marital fertility, from at least 1540 to 1890, then the modern era, with regulated marital fertility, lower for higher social classes. We show there were in fact three fertility regimes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014193661
If social outcomes have social causation, mothers and fathers in different societies will have different effects on child outcomes. Social mobility rates on the patriline will differ from that on the matriline. From an extensive family lineage of 426,552 persons in England 1650-2023 we estimate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014454695
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014435332
The European Marriage Pattern (EMP), in place in NW Europe for perhaps 500 years, substantially limited fertility. But how could such limitation persist when some individuals who deviated from the EMP norm had more children? If their children inherited their deviant behaviors, their descendants...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014530157