Showing 1 - 10 of 387
I consider the problem of assigning agents to indivisible objects, in which each agent pays a price for his object and all prices sum to a given constant. The objective is to select an assignment-price pair that is envy-free with respect to the agents' true preferences. I propose a simple...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011517013
This paper studies the problem of assigning a set of indivisible objects to a set of agents when monetary transfers are not allowed and agents reveal only ordinal preferences, but random assignments are possible. We offer two characterizations of the probabilistic serial mechanism, which assigns...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011684921
We study problems of allocating objects among people. Some objects may be initially owned and the rest are unowned. Each person needs exactly one object and initially owns at most one object. We drop the common assumption of strict preferences. Without this assumption, it suffices to study...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014183375
We revisit the classical object reallocation problem under strict preferences. When attention is constrained to the set of Pareto-efficient rules, it is known that TTC is the only rule that is strategyproof and individually-rational. We hence relax this constraint and consider pair-efficiency. A...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013308232
We search for impartiality in the allocation of objects when monetary transfers are not possible. Our main focus is anonymity. The standard definition requires that if agents' names are permuted, their assignments should be permuted in the same way. Since no rule satisfies this definition in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010487558
In this paper we are interested in efficient and individually rational exchange rules for markets with heterogeneous indivisible goods that exclude the possibility that an agent benefits by regrouping goods in her initial endowment. We present a suitable environment in which the existence of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003731637
We consider house allocation problems (Shapley and Scarf, 1974) with strict preferences. We introduce a new axiom called pre-exchange-proofness, which states that no pair of agents gain by exchanging their endowments with each other prior to the operation of the chosen rule. We establish that a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012961731
We consider house (re)allocation problems (Shapley and Scarf, 1974) with strict preferences. We are concerned with the possibility that a pair of agents may gain by swapping their endowments before the operation of the chosen rule. A rule is called endowments-swapping-proof if it is immune to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012921955
Each of n ≥ 1 identical buyers (and m ≥ 1 identical sellers) wants to buy (sell) a single unit of an indivisible good. The core predicts a unique and extreme outcome: the entire surplus is split evenly among the buyers when m n and among the sellers when m n; the long side gets nothing. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003782414
We prove that group strategy-proofness and strategy-proofness are equivalent requirements on stable mechanisms in priority-based resource allocation problems with multi-unit demand. The result extends to the model with contracts
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901146