Showing 1 - 7 of 7
We study a situation where two players first choose a sharing rule, then invest into a joint production process, and then split joint benefits. We investigate how social preferences determine investments. In our experiment we find that even the materially disadvantaged player cares more for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266106
We explore experimentally how power asymmetries between partners affect relationship-specific investments. We find that on average players' investments are larger than equilibrium investments. In contrast to social dilemma experiments, in our experiment preferences for social welfare and those...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010332982
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003826400
We explore experimentally how power asymmetries between partners affect relationship-specific investments. We find that on average players' investments are larger than equilibrium investments. In contrast to social dilemma experiments, in our experiment preferences for social welfare and those...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003809931
We study a situation where two players first choose a sharing rule, then invest into a joint production process, and then split joint benefits. We investigate how social preferences determine investments. In our experiment we find that even the materially disadvantaged player cares more for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003937075
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009762369
We study a situation where two players first choose a sharing rule, then invest into a joint production process, and then split joint benefits. We investigate how social preferences determine investments. In our experiment we find that even the materially disadvantaged player cares more for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013316263