Showing 1 - 10 of 36
Undiscounted utilitarianism as a criterion of intergeneration justice has been questioned for different reasons: It has been argued (1) that any complete ordering of allocations with an infinite number of generations guaranteeing an optimal allocation must involve discounting, and (2) that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010315030
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003532367
Undiscounted utilitarianism as a criterion of intergeneration justice has been questioned for different reasons: It has been argued (1) that any complete ordering of allocations with an infinite number of generations guaranteeing an optimal allocation must involve discounting, and (2) that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009780201
Undiscounted utilitarianism as a criterion of intergeneration justice has been questioned for different reasons: It has been argued (1) that any complete ordering of allocations with an infinite number of generations guaranteeing an optimal allocation must involve discounting, and (2) that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005405840
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001834217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001451068
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003351865
The discounted utilitarian criterion for infinite horizon social choice has been criticized for treating generations unequally. We propose an extended rank-discounted utilitarian (ERDU) criterion instead. The criterion amounts to discounted utilitarianism on non-decreasing streams, but it treats...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008697034
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009549774
Climate policies have stochastic consequences that involve a great number of generations. This calls for evaluating social risk (what kind of societies will future people be born into) rather than individual risk (what will happen to people during their own lifetimes). As a response we propose...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010530542