Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001209660
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003437238
We define predatory lending as a welfare-reducing provision of credit. Using a textbook model, we show that lenders profit if they can tempt households into “debt traps,” that is, overborrowing and delinquency. We then test whether payday lending fits our definition of predatory. We find...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010283443
Payday loans are widely condemned as a “predatory debt trap.” We test that claim by researching how households in Georgia and North Carolina have fared since those states banned payday loans in May 2004 and December 2005. Compared with households in states where payday lending is permitted,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010283492
We find that competition from payday lenders leads depository institutions to raise overdraft fees and reduce the availability of “free” checking accounts. We attribute this rise in prices partly to adverse selection created by banks’ practice of charging a flat fee regardless of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003947557
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003589962
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009575282
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011350535
We find that competition from payday lenders leads depository institutions to raise overdraft fees and reduce the availability of “free” checking accounts. We attribute this rise in prices partly to adverse selection created by banks’ practice of charging a flat fee regardless of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204039
Payday loans are widely condemned as a “predatory debt trap.” We test that claim by researching how households in Georgia and North Carolina have fared since those states banned payday loans in May 2004 and December 2005. Compared with households in states where payday lending is permitted,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014222461