Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001260239
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000758323
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000767720
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001201617
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001195870
The sovereign-debt literature has often implicitly assumed that all the power in the bargaining game between debtor and creditor lies with the latter. An earlier paper provided a game-theoretic basis for this contention. in that all the subgame-perfect equilibria of the game modeled have an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012476067
The process of debt-rescheduling between a creditor and a sovereign (LDC) debtor is modeled as a noncooperative game built on a one-sector growth model. The creditor's threat to impose default penalties is ignored here as inherently incredible; instead, the debtor's motivation for repayment is to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012476473
The establishment of an asking, or ceiling, price from which reductions can be bargained is a common selling practice. For a monopolist seller of a single object, this article characterizes the best such ceiling price and shows that its use is optimal among all incentive-compatible mechanisms in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014112008
The sovereign-debt literature has often implicitly assumed that all the power in the bargaining game between debtor and creditor lies with the latter. An earlier paper provided a game-theoretic basis for this contention. in that all the subgame-perfect equilibria of the game modeled have an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013245724
The process of debt-rescheduling between a creditor and a sovereign (LDC) debtor is modeled as a noncooperative game built on a one-sector growth model. The creditor's threat to impose default penalties is ignored here as inherently incredible; instead, the debtor's motivation for repayment is to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013248422