Showing 1 - 10 of 2,153
We report experimental findings on the role of charitable promises in bargaining settings. We vary the enforceability of such promises within variants of ultimatum games where the proposer suggest a split between himself, the responder and a char-itable donation. By reneging on initial pledges,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012534829
This paper analyses the role of ratification quotas in multilateral agreements over emission reduction. The higher is the quota, the lower is the level of emissions in case the agreement comes into force, but the higher is also the risk of failure. In a setting with incomplete information, two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010439371
We consider ultimatum bargaining over the provision of a public good. Offer-maker and responder can delegate their decisions to agents, whose actual decision rules are opaque. We show that the responder will benefit from strategic opacity, even with bilateral delegation. The incomplete...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013332120
We present a simple two-steps procedure for a within-subject test of the inequity aversion model of Fehr and Schmidt (1999). In the first step, subjects played modified ultimatum and dictator games and were classified according to their preferences. In the second step, subjects with specific...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014050068
A profit-maximizing public good supplier endogenously determines the level of the public good and simultaneously negotiates with beneficiaries of the good one by one. A pre-negotiation commitment on the production level of the public good by the supplier enhances the internalization of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012903962
We examine the voluntary participation problem in negotiations on providing public goods. In contrast to earlier studies, negotiation is followed by renegotiation in our model. First, players decide whether to participate in a negotiation, and the participants produce a public good. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014343702
We present a simple two-steps procedure for a within-subject test of the inequity aversion model of Fehr and Schmidt (1999). In the first step, subjects played modified ultimatum and dictator games and were classified according to their preferences. In the second step, subjects with specific...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010297936
experiment with fiveperson committees that compares three alternative voting rules: unanimity (q=5); majority (q=3); and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009412019
We report on an experiment comparing two institutions governing bargaining over public good allocations. In our setting … mandatory rule thus creates a dynamic relationship between current decisions and future payoffs, and our experiment tests the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014262141
Experimental studies show that the Nash equilibrium and its refinements are poor predictors of behavior in non-cooperative strategic games. Cooperation models, such as ERC and inequality aversion, yield superior predictions compared to the standard game theory predictions. However, those models...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013252726