Showing 1 - 10 of 1,971
Standardized classroom economics experiments provide a treasure trove of evidence about how well results reproduce when nearly-identical methods are used. We use a sample of around 20,000 observations to test reproducibility in bargaining and trading. Ultimatum bargaining exhibits some...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012911114
Experimental studies show that the Nash equilibrium and its refinements are poor predictors of behavior in non-cooperative strategic games. Cooperation models, such as ERC and inequality aversion, yield superior predictions compared to the standard game theory predictions. However, those models...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013252726
Delegating bargaining to an intermediary agent is common practice in many situations. The proposer, while not actively bargaining, sets constraints on the intermediary agent's offer. We study ultimatum games where proposers delegate bargaining to an intermediary agent by setting boundaries on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013252752
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012204154
experiment compares one-shot and indefinite horizon versions of random-proposer majority bargaining (the Baron-Ferejohn game …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011762571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011636242
We report experimental findings on the role of charitable promises in bargaining settings. We vary the enforceability of such promises within variants of ultimatum games where the proposer suggest a split between himself, the responder and a char-itable donation. By reneging on initial pledges,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012534829
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011523373
by a draw from an Ellsberg urn. In a within-subject experiment, subjects make decisions in three different bargaining …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014380287
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000151779