Showing 1 - 10 of 17
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011485383
We consider an upstream firm U that supplies a key input to two symmetric downstream firms, A and B, that sell differentiated products. U negotiates bilaterally with A and B over a linear input price, and A and B set output prices. We assume Nash-in-Nash bargaining for input prices, and Bertrand...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012841190
We consider a vertically integrated input monopolist supplying to a differentiated downstream rival. With linear input pricing, at the margin the firm unambiguously wants the rival to expand — unlike standard oligopoly with no supply relationship — for either Cournot or Bertrand competition....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012976946
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012549696
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012619840
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012619864
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012607140
We examine the role of private information on the impact of vertical mergers. A vertical merger can improve the information that is available to an upstream monopolist because, after the merger, the monopolist can observe the cost of its downstream merger partner. In the pre-merger world,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013223455
This article explains the inherent loss of an indirect competitor and reduction in competition when a vertical merger raises input foreclosure concerns. We then calculate a measure of the effective increase in the HHI measure of concentration for the downstream market, and we refer to this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013242107
We consider differentiated duopolists facing symmetric linear demands and using Cobb-Douglas technologies with two inputs: a monopolized input and a competitively supplied input. Unlike with fixed-proportions technologies, a merger between the input monopolist and either firm can reduce welfare....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013249335