Showing 1 - 10 of 10
We analyze four methods to measure unexplained gaps in mean outcomes: three decompositions based on the seminal work of Oaxaca (1973) and Blinder (1973) and an approach involving a seemingly naive regression that includes a group indicator variable. Our analysis yields two principal findings. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003832324
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003955122
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011431747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003814652
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014309141
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000694580
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000712283
Several reasons are offered why workers will receive larger compensating wage differentials for increases in the duration of wage losses than for increases in the probability of loss that produce the same expected loss. A formal model of occupational choice is developed that shows the extent to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013244902
Several reasons are offered why workers will receive larger compensating wage differentials for increases in the duration of wage losses than for increases in the probability of loss that produce the same expected loss. A formal model of occupational choice is developed that shows the extent to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012477188
We analyze four methods to measure unexplained gaps in mean outcomes: three decompositions based on the seminal work of Oaxaca (1973) and Blinder (1973) and an approach involving a seemingly naïve regression that includes a group indicator variable. Our analysis yields two principal findings....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013159930