Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Prior research on 'strategic voting' has reached the conclusion that unanimity rule is uniquely bad: it results in destruction of information, and hence makes voters worse off. We show that this conclusion depends critically on the assumption that the issue being voted on is exogenous, i.e.,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010277536
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003727433
Prior research on "strategic voting" has reached the conclusion that unanimity rule is uniquely bad: it results in destruction of information, and hence makes voters worse off. We show that this conclusion depends critically on the assumption that the issue being voted on is exogenous, i.e.,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003787573
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003951579
We develop a model to study the political economy implications of information gatekeeping, i.e., a policy of granting access only to friendly media outlets and denying access to critical ones. While an incumbent prefers positive bias, granting access improves her re-election probability only if...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011824212
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012583377
To enact a policy, a leader needs votes from committee members with heterogeneous opposition intensities. She sequentially offers transfers in exchange for votes. The transfers are either promises paid only if the policy passes or paid up front. With transfer promises, a vote costs nearly zero....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013222525
To enact a policy, a leader needs votes from committee members with heterogeneous opposition intensities. She sequentially offers transfers in exchange for votes. The transfers are either promises paid only if the policy is put to a vote or paid up front. With transfer promises, the leader buys...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012832737
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013473018