Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011665639
In this paper we begin by stressing the empirical importance of non-linear weighting of probabilities, which expected utility theory (EU) is unable to accommodate. We then go on to outline three stylized facts on non-linear weighting that any alternative theory of risk must address. These are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003953021
Evidence shows that (i) people overweight low probabilities and underweight high probabilities, but (ii) ignore events of extremely low probability and treat extremely high probability events as certain. The main alternative decision theories, rank dependent utility (RDU) and cumulative prospect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003954029
We focus on four stylized facts of behavior under risk. Decision makers: (1) Overweight low probabilities and underweight high probabilities. (2) Ignore events of extremely low probability and treat extremely high probability events as certain. (3) Buy inadequate insurance for very low...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003954032
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003054300
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003054342
We formulate a simple quantum decision model of the Ellsberg paradox. We report the results of an experiment we performed to test the matching probabilities predicted by this model using an incentive compatible method. We find that the theoretical predictions of the model are in conformity with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011877824
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011473560