Showing 1 - 10 of 20
We study the importance of uncertainty and public finance to the welfare ranking of three environmental policy instruments: pollution taxes, pollution permits and Kyoto-like numerical rules for emissions. The setup is the basic stochastic neoclassical growth model augmented with the assumptions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003942680
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003962898
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011287718
This paper studies the difference between public production and public finance of public goods in a dynamic general equilibrium setup. By public finance, we mean that the public good is produced by private providers with the government financing their costs. When the model is calibrated to match...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009130257
We study the importance of uncertainty and public finance to the welfare ranking of three environmental policy instruments: pollution taxes, pollution permits and Kyoto-like numerical rules for emissions. The setup is the basic stochastic neoclassical growth model augmented with the assumptions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013316232
We welfare rank different types of second-best environmental policy. The focus is on the roles of uncertainty and public finance. The setup is the basic stochastic neoclassical growth model augmented with the assumptions that pollution occurs as a by-product of output produced and environmental...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014080294
In this paper, we quantitatively assess the welfare implications of alternative public education spending rules. To this end, we employ a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model in which human capital externalities and public education expenditures, financed by distorting taxes, enhance the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003806000
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003806160
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003475266
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003605197