Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000686580
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000785356
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011303721
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002721200
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003366774
Empirical welfare analyses often impose stringent parametric assumptions on individuals' preferences and neglect unobserved preference heterogeneity. In this paper, we develop a framework to conduct individual and social welfare analysis for discrete choice that does not suffer from these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012513281
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012516811
We apply recently proposed individual welfare measures in the context of preference heterogeneity, derived from structural labour supply models. Contrary to the standard practice of using reference preferences and wages, these measures preserve preference heterogeneity in the normative step of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010341149
Fleurbaey, Hagnere and Trannoy (2003) develop a bounded dominance test to make robust welfare comparisons, which is intermediate between Ebert's (1999) cardinal dominance criterion - generalized Lorenz dominance applied to household incomes, divided and weighted by an equivalence scale - and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014062239
Empirical welfare analyses often impose stringent parametric assumptions on individuals’ preferences and neglect unobserved preference heterogeneity. In this paper, we develop a framework to conduct individual and social welfare analysis for discrete choice that does not suffer from these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013228344