Showing 1 - 10 of 21
In this paper, we compare four months of Reuters EFX high frequency indicative data with D2000-1 inter-dealer transaction data for DEM/USD and GBP/USD. Contrary to previous studies, we find, using various information measures, that the matched tick-by-tick indicative data bear no qualitative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003900329
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011337680
Using a comprehensive dataset of international cross-listings spanning 34 (50) home (target) countries, we examine whether mandatory IFRS adoption facilitates firms' cross-listing activities. Our results using difference-in-differences analyses show that firms that mandatorily adopt IFRS exhibit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012973002
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008987227
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011537246
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009512171
Recent studies have used the value spread to predict aggregate stock returns to construct cash-flow betas that appear to explain the size and value anomalies. We show that two related variables, the book-to-market spread (the book-to-market of value stocks minus that of growth stocks) and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012784621
The anomalies literature is infested with widespread p-hacking. We replicate the entire anomalies literature in finance and accounting by compiling a largest-to-date data library that contains 447 anomaly variables. With microcaps alleviated via New York Stock Exchange breakpoints and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012956913
Most anomalies fail to hold up to currently acceptable standards for empirical finance. With microcaps mitigated via NYSE breakpoints and value-weighted returns, 65% of the 452 anomalies in our data library, including 96% of the trading frictions category, cannot clear the single test hurdle of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012908639
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012657804