Showing 1 - 10 of 34
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011567928
This paper tests two hypotheses from the theory of elimination tournaments: (i) that uneven tournaments, where the contestants are ex ante heterogeneous, entail lower effort exertion; this is a prediction from agency theory that has not been tested empirically before; and (ii) whether incentives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261647
We conduct a natural field experiment in a large retail chain to test basic predictions of tournament theory regarding prize spread and noise. A random subset of the 208 stores participates in two-stage elimination tournaments. Tournaments differ in the distribution of prize money across winners...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010282278
We conduct a field experiment in a large retail chain to test basic predictions of tournament theory regarding prize spread and noise. A random subset of the 208 stores participates in two-stage elimination tournaments. Tournaments differ in the distribution of prize money across winners of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010326149
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011283975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009720760
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012612928
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013172576
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014320922
If firms compete in all-pay auctions with complete information, silent shareholdings introduce asymmetric externalities into the all-pay auction framework. If the strongest firm owns a large share in the second strongest firm, this may make the strongest firm abstain from bidding. As a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261198