Showing 1 - 10 of 381
How do incentives to collude depend on how asymmetric firms are? In many markets product quality is an important parameter that determines firms' market strategies. We study collusion in a quality-differentiated duopoly and we adopt a Nash bargaining approach to compute the collusive equilibrium...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012655386
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010439750
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014334780
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011638340
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011700300
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013543203
Incumbent firms have two basic possibilities to improve their competitive position in the product market: investment in R&D and the creation of entry barriers to the disadvantage of potential rivals, e.g. through lobbying activities, campaign contributions, bribes or the adoption of incompatible...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264105
Two suppliers of a homogenous good know that, in the second period, they will be able to collude. Gains from collusion are split according to the Nash bargaining solution. In the first period, either of them is able to invest into process innovation. Innovation changes the status quo pay-off,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264811
This article tests experimentally whether a high degree of collusion on advertisement expenditures facilitate tacit price collusion in duopoly markets. Two environments are tested, in which the size of the spillover between advertising expenditures is varied. The results show that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264854
The recent Impala Judgment by the CFI on the Sony/BMG Decision by the Commission represents the most important ruling on collective dominance since Airtours. We review both the Decision and the Judgment and derive implications for the institutional and substantive development of EU Merger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010265712