Showing 1 - 10 of 14,055
provided the federal government with limited authority to "control" air pollution, but signaled impending federal regulation …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012585446
This paper shifts the perspective of the recent green paradox literature towards the demand side. Based on a simple model, I show that a subsidy on input factors in a Cobb-Douglas production function may contribute substantially to postponing resource extraction into the future and, thereby, to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011529800
Anticipated and unilateral climate policies are ineffective when fossil fuel owners respond by shifting supply intertemporally (the green paradox) or spatially (carbon leakage). These mechanisms rely crucially on the exhaustibility of fossil fuels. We analyze the effect of anticipated and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013067762
The green paradox states that a gradually more ambitious climate policy such as a renewables subsidy or an anticipated carbon tax induces fossil fuel owners to extract more rapidly and accelerate global warming. However, if extraction becomes more costly as reserves are depleted, such policies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013034920
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009738797
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011702784
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001564941
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010234379
In a model where firms face a continuous choice of how much to invest in environmental innovation, we show that an ever stricter environmental policy does not always lead to ever cleaner production methods and ever lower production of polluting goods. It does so when the abatement technology is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013051606