Showing 1 - 10 of 120
The paper argues for three points. The first purpose of the paper is to show that Carl Menger would have rejected Ludwig von Mises’ methodological apriorism. Second, I argue that Carl Menger was a pluralist about the methods of theoretical economics and that Mises was rather less of a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014264585
Standard histories of economics usually treat the “marginal revolution” of the midnineteenth century as both supplanting the “classical” economics of Smith and Ricardo and as advancing the idea of economics as a mathematical science. The marginalists – especially Jevons and Walras –...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012933369
Standard histories of economics usually treat the "marginal revolution" of the midnineteenth century as both supplanting the "classical" economics of Smith and Ricardo and as advancing the idea of economics as a mathematical science. The marginalists - especially Jevons and Walras - viewed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011695287
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009674352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011765391
Critical reflection concerning the tension existing between developing the body of economic knowledge in the image of mathematics led to discovering a double epistemological rupture in developing economic theory. The first, in the mid nineteenth century, recognised mathematics as being the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012776312
For the last few decades, considerable attention has been paid to the methodology of mainstream economics. It is not mere chance that economics is surrounded by methodological debates. If its relevance is at stake, this can be either refuted or proven most efficiently at a methodological level....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012952404
Mainstream economics has been running the gauntlet of adverse criticism for decades. These critiques claim as a message of central importance that mainstream economics has lost its relevance as for understanding reality. By making a brief comparison between the methodological strategies of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012959194
Mainstream economics has been running the gauntlet of adverse criticism for decades. These critiques claim as a message of central importance that mainstream economics has lost its relevance for understanding reality. By making a brief comparison between the methodological strategies of the main...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012945747
This study explains the causes of capital controversies that occurred thrice in economic history, namely, at the turn of the 20th century, in the 1930s, and in the 1960s. Recurrence of controversies seeks answers from various theoretical frameworks. Differences between the Classical and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013016791