Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Machine generated contents note:1.Introduction: Can Russia And Its Oil Companies Handle Change? --2.Rosneft: Lord Of The Rigs --3.Lukoil: Patriotic Cosmopolite --4.Gazprom Neft: Reformed Rake --5.Surgutneftegas: Quiet Conservative --6.Tatneft: Genghis Can --7.Conclusion: Champions Of Change.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012605505
For a century, the geopolitics of energy has been synonymous with the geopolitics of oil and gas. However, geopolitics and the global energy economy are both changing. The international order predominant since the end of World War II faces mounting challenges. At the same time, renewable energy...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011670799
This open access book explores climate change impacts, adaptation, and mitigation in Central Asia and discusses policy options for the Central Asian governments. To address the urgent need for local scholarship on climate change in Central Asia, and in particular the need for more research by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014248152
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013472427
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014440758
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013535442
For a century, the geopolitics of energy has been synonymous with the geopolitics of oil and gas. However, geopolitics and the global energy economy are both changing. The international order predominant since the end of World War II faces mounting challenges. At the same time, renewable energy...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012952722
The report starts by presenting the numerous arguments for reducing energy subsidies, both at a general level and for Myanmar in particular. After identifying electricity pricing as the main area for potential energy subsidy reform in Myanmar, and the reasons for such reform. It then examines...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012949390
We find that both economic theory and empirical results show that carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs) will be ineffective at meeting global carbon emissions goals. The consensus of 12 computable general equilibrium (CGE) model estimates is that CBAMs can be expected to reduce (but not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014078088
We find that both economic theory and empirical results show that carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs) will be ineffective at meeting global carbon emissions goals. The consensus of 12 computable general equilibrium (CGE) model estimates is that CBAMs can be expected to reduce (but not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014078988