Government-controlled investors, including state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds, have greatly expanded their international activities in recent years. This paper describes the existing policy landscape of international investments by government-controlled investors under both...

Introduction to International Investment Policy and Rationale for an Interdisciplinary Approach / J Anthony VanDuzer, Patrick Leblond, and Stephen Gelb -- Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in the 21st Century / Ari Van Assche -- Actors, Institutions, and Policy in Host Countries / Krista...

Introduction to International Investment Policy and Rationale for an Interdisciplinary Approach / J Anthony VanDuzer, Patrick Leblond, and Stephen Gelb -- Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in the 21st Century / Ari Van Assche -- Actors, Institutions, and Policy in Host Countries / Krista...

This paper investigates the effect of arbitral proceedings on bilateral portfolio equity investments in emerging markets. Investment disputes may deter foreign investors as they reveal a government’s poor behavior towards foreign investors. The analysis investigates the effects of the first...

International investment agreements (IIAs) almost universally define their temporal validity and thus set conditions for States’ exit from these treaties. This study presents the results of the survey of language that determines the temporal validity of 2,061 bilateral investment agreements...

Claims by company shareholders seeking damages from governments for so-called "reflective loss" now make up a substantial part of the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) caseload. (Shareholders’ reflective loss is incurred as a result of injury to “their” company, typically a loss in...

Investor-State dispute settlement mechanisms (ISDS) are an important component of most International Investment Agreements (IIAs) and have significant influence on how disputes between States and investors are resolved. This statistical survey of a large sample of 1,660 bilateral investment...

Advanced systems of domestic corporate law generally apply a “no reflective loss” principle to shareholder claims. Shareholder claims are permitted for direct injury to shareholder rights (such as voting rights). But shareholders generally cannot bring claims for reflective loss incurred as...