Showing 1 - 10 of 10
We compare the findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers find QE to be more effective than academic papers do. Central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012603079
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012603836
We compare the findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers find QE to be more effective than academic papers do. Central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013216559
We compare the findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers find QE to be more effective than academic papers do. Central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013238911
Fabo, Jančoková, Kempf, and Pástor (2021) show that papers written by central bank researchers find quantitative easing (QE) to be more effective than papers written by academics. Weale and Wieladek (2022) show that a subset of these results lose statistical significance when OLS regressions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014249438
We compare the findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers find QE to be more effective than academic papers do. Central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013403575
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014301300
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014452074
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014233526
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012321263