Showing 1 - 10 of 1,025
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012825420
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012932764
In this essay, we discuss empirical research on the economic effects of the civil justice system. We discuss research on the effects of three substantive bodies of law—contracts, torts, and property—and research on the effects of the litigation process. We begin with a review of studies of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014023511
Asking the right question can be as important as giving the right answer. In her book Judging Civil Justice, Dame Hazel Genn forcefully argues that the right question about the civil justice system is not “how much justice we can afford” but “how much justice can we afford to forego.”...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115112
The paper examines the interdependence of historical legacies and current contextual factors as determinants of economic and political performance. It shows that behavioral patterns based on identical legacies could lead to very different (if not the opposite) results in regions with different...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009315580
Prior to the establishment of the non-judicial Australian Takeovers Panel in 2001, takeover litigation before the courts rarely led to an appeal to a higher court; for commercial reasons, many cases were settled before a final judicial resolution was reached. Before the introduction of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013012427
A settlement is an agreement between parties to a dispute. In everyday parlance and in academic scholarship, settlement is juxtaposed to trial or some other method of dispute resolution in which a third-party factfinder ultimately picks a winner and announces a score. The “trial versus...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011578655
This article translates and extends Becker (1968) from public law enforcement to private litigation by examining optimal legal system design in a model with private suits, signals of case strength, court error, and two types of primary behavior: harmful acts that may be deterred and benign acts...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011772058
Settlements are often considered to be welfare-enhancing because they save time and litigation costs. In the presence of court error, however, this conclusion may be wrong. Court decisions create positive externalities for future litigants which will not occur if a dispute is settled out of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008760481
The study focuses on the admissibility and assessment of economic expertise in EC competition law litigation. I start by exploring the broader issues raised by the integration of economic expertise in litigation: in particular the risk of moral hazard and adverse selection because of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204308