Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009573516
We consider a model where multiple principals repeatedly offer short-term contracts to three or more agents with private information. Under low discounting there exists a simple class of mechanisms that sustains all equilibrium allocations that could be generated by arbitrarily complex...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010671444
This paper studies how implicit collusion may take place through simple non-exclusive contracting under adverse selection when multiple buyers (e.g., entrepreneurs with risky projects) non-exclusively contract with multiple firms (e.g., banks). It shows that any price schedule can be supported...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009191053
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012248990
This paper studies how implicit collusion may take place through simple non-exclusive contracting under adverse selection when multiple buyers (e.g., entrepreneurs with risky projects) non-exclusively contract with multiple firms (e.g., banks). It shows that any price schedule can be supported...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010633793
This paper provides a set of mechanisms that we refer to as emph{reciprocal mechanisms. }These mechanisms have the property that every outcome that can be supported as a Bayesian equilibrium in a competing mechanism game can be supported as an equilibrium in reciprocal mechanisms. In this sense,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008468163
It is known that mechanism designers can extract agents' information about competitors' mechanisms in a competing mechanism game. This makes it possible for sellers to punish each other for deviations even when they do not directly observe other sellers' mechanisms. This allows for very...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011188090