Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Perron (1989) introduced a variety of unit root tests that are valid when a break in the trend function of a time series is present. The motivation was to devise testing procedures that were invariant to the magnitude of the shift in level and/or slope. In particular, if a change is present it...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004972924
In empirical applications based on linear regression models, structural changes often occur in both the error variance and regression coefficients, possibly at different dates. A commonly applied method is to first test for changes in the coefficients (or in the error variance) and, conditional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012696237
This paper considers testing procedures for the null hypothesis of a unit root process against the alternative of a fractional process, called a fractional unit root test. We extend the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests of Robinson (1994) and Tanaka (1999), which are locally best invariant and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011755361
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012583297
This paper considers testing procedures for the null hypothesis of a unit root process against the alternative of a fractional process, called a fractional unit root test. We extend the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests of Robinson (1994) and Tanaka (1999), which are locally best invariant and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011654059
In empirical applications based on linear regression models, structural changes often occur in both the error variance and regression coefficients, possibly at different dates. A commonly applied method is to first test for changes in the coefficients (or in the error variance) and, conditional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012025784
This paper considers issues related to estimation, inference and computation with multiple structural changes occurring at unknown dates in a system of equations. Changes can occur in the regression coefficients and/or the covariance matrix of the errors. We also allow arbitrary restrictions on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004991573
Elliott and Müller (2006) considered the problem of testing for general types of parameter variations, including infrequent breaks. They developed a framework that yields optimal tests, in the sense that they nearly attain some local Gaussian power envelop. The main ingredient in their setup is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004991592
The issue addressed in this paper is that of testing for common breaks across or within equations. Our framework is very general and allows integrated regressors and trends as well as stationary regressors. The null hypothesis is that some subsets of the parameters (either regression coecients...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010779512
Elliott and Müller (2006) considered the problem of testing for general types of parameter variations, including infrequent breaks. They developed a framework that yields optimal tests, in the sense that they nearly attain some local Gaussian power envelop. The main ingredient in their setup is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011144003