Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009783306
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009349102
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011937980
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011376700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010229515
Most economists will agree that Milton Friedman is a brilliant economist. Yet, the majority assessment is that his work is ideologically flawed, and that the Marshallian economics he advocates has been superseded by Walrasian economics. In this paper I argue that the reason for this negative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009219370
Recently, Ben Bernanke has argued that in the events leading up to the financial crisis, mistakes were made, but they were primarily engineering or management mistakes, not mistakes in the fundamental science of macroeconomics, which he sees as sound. This paper argues that Bernanke is wrong and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009372066
From the movie, Inside Job, one gets the sense that economists are ethically challenged because they take payments for writing papers that say what the funders of their research want them to say. This paper takes issue with that and suggests that the more serious ethical problem of economics has...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009368507
In the paper "Conversation or Monologue: On Advising Heterodox Economists," we are taken to task by Matías Vernengo on a number of issues made in Colander, Holt, and Rosser (2004b; 2007-8). In this paper, we respond to two central arguments made by Vernengo, and stand by our earlier arguments that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008741361
This paper argues that the DSGE approach to macroeconometrics is the dominant approach because it meets the institutional needs of the replicator dynamics of the profession, not because it is necessarily the best way to do macroeconometrics. It further argues that this “DSGE-theory first”...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008479221