Showing 1 - 9 of 9
We investigate whether the set of Kreps and Porteus (1978) preferences include classes of preferences that are stationary, monotonic and well-ordered in terms of risk aversion. We prove that the class of preferences introduced by Hansen and Sargent (1995) in their robustness analysis is the only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009721838
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012013819
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012319445
We investigate whether the set of Kreps and Porteus (1978) preferences include classes of preferences that are stationary, monotonic and well-ordered in terms of risk aversion. We prove that the class of preferences introduced by Hansen and Sargent (1995) in their robustness analysis is the only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011753236
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010861555
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008462730
We consider a formal approach to comparative risk aversion and applies it to intertemporal choice models. This allows us to ask whether standard classes of utility functions, such as those inspired by Kihlstrom and Mirman (1974), Selden (1978), Epstein and Zin (1989) and Quiggin (1982) are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008465347
We consider a formal approach to comparative risk aversion and apply it to intertemporal choice models. This makes it possible to investigate whether standard classes of utility functions, such as those inspired from Kihlstrom and Mirman (1974), Selden (1978), Epstein and Zin (1989) or Quiggin...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010707569
We investigate whether the set of Kreps and Porteus (1978) preferences include classes of preferences that are stationary, monotonic and well-ordered in terms of risk aversion. We prove that the class of preferences introduced by Hansen and Sargent (1995) in their robustness analysis is the only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010610551