Showing 1 - 10 of 505
Various forecasts using panel data with spatial error correlation are compared using Monte Carlo experiments. The true data generating process is assumed to be a simple error component regression model with spatial remainder disturbances of the autoregressive or moving average type. The best...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010617666
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005296983
This paper reconsiders the Tobin q investment model studied by Hsiao et al. (1999) using a panel of 337 U.S. firms over the period 1982–1998. It contrasts the out-of-sample forecasts performance of hierarchical Bayes, shrinkage, as well as heterogeneous and homogeneous panel data estimators....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005758271
This paper studies the performance of panel unit root tests when spatial effects are present that account for cross-section correlation. Monte Carlo simulations show that there can be considerable size distortions in panel unit root tests when the true specification exhibits spatial error...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005582352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005228870
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005257662
This paper contrasts the performance of heterogeneous and shrinkage estimators versus the more traditional homogeneous panel data estimators. The analysis utilizes a panel data set from 21 French regions over the period 1973–1998 and a dynamic demand specification to study the gasoline demand...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005382203
Chamberlain [Chamberlain, G., 1982. Multivariate regression models for panel data. Journal of Econometrics 18, 5-46] showed that the fixed effects (FE) specification imposes testable restrictions on the coefficients from regressions of all leads and lags of dependent variables on all leads and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005023147
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001755288
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001916245