Showing 1 - 10 of 249
We present a model of inductive inference that includes, as special cases, Bayesian reasoning, case-based reasoning, and rule-based reasoning. This unified framework allows us to examine how the various modes of inductive inference can be combined and how their relative weights change...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010678870
We suggest a model in which theories are ranked given various databases. Certain axioms on such rankings imply a numerical representation that is the sum of the log-likelihood of the theory and a fixed number for each theory, which may be interpreted as a measure of its complexity. This additive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008860962
Assume we are asked to predict a real-valued variable yt based on certain characteristics , and on a database consisting of for i=1,...,n. Analogical reasoning suggests to combine past observations of x and y with the current values of x to generate an assessment of y by similarity-weighted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008866559
The art of rhetoric may be defined as changing other people's minds (opinions, beliefs) without providing them new information. One technique heavily used by rhetoric employs analogies. Using analogies, one may draw the listener's attention to similarities between cases and to re-organize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010744395
Pareto efficiency is not as compelling when people hold different beliefs as it is under common beliefs or certainty. In the present paper we propose to restrict the standard Pareto relation by imposing the following constraint: in order for one allocation to dominate another, all agents must...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011074797
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011085248
We argue that the notion of Pareto dominance is not as compelling in the presence of uncertainty as it is under certainty. In particular, voluntary trade based on differences in tastes is commonly accepted as desirable, because tastes cannot be wrong. By contrast, voluntary trade based on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011085334
This note argues that, under some circumstances, it is more rational not to behave in accordance with a Bayesian prior than to do so. The starting point is that in the absence of information, choosing a prior is arbitrary. If the prior is to have meaningful implications, it is more rational to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008782979
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012090489
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005296274