Showing 1 - 10 of 147
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005239439
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005239513
This paper proposes a quantitative modification of standard utility elicitation procedures, such as the probability and certainty equivalence methods, to correct for commonly observed violations of expected utility. Traditionally, decision analysis assumes expected utility not only for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009218192
An important reason why people violate expected utility theory is probability weighting. Previous studies on the probability weighting function typically assume a specific parametric form, exclude heterogeneity in individual preferences, and exclusively consider monetary decision making. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009203796
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006089172
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006092208
The aim of The Elgar Companion to Health Economics is to take an audience of advanced undergraduates, postgraduates and researchers to the frontier of research in health economics, by providing them with short and easily readable introductions to key topics. The volume brings together 50...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011180401
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012881032
The paper addresses some limitations of the QALY approach and outlines a valuation procedure that may overcome these limitations. In particular, we focus on the following issues: the distinction between assessing individual utility and assessing societal value of health care; the need to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005690014
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001616717