Showing 1 - 10 of 214
We document widespread violations of stochastic dominance in the one-month S&P 500 index options market over the period 1986-2002. These violations imply that a trader can improve her expected utility by engaging in a zero-net-cost trade. We allow the market to be incomplete and also imperfect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266937
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266945
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003791478
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008656711
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003221993
We document widespread violations of stochastic dominance in the one-month S&P 500 index options market over the period 1986-2002. These violations imply that a trader can improve her expected utility by engaging in a zero-net-cost trade. We allow the market to be incomplete and also imperfect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003222135
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001661181
American options on the S&P 500 index futures that violate the stochastic dominance bounds of Constantinides and Perrakis (2007) from 1983 to 2006 are identified as potentially profitable trades. Call bid prices more frequently violate their upper bound than put bid prices do, while violations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013069352
Widespread violations of stochastic dominance by 1-month Samp;P 500 index call options over 1986-2006 imply that a trader can improve expected utility by engaging in a zero-net-cost trade net of transaction costs and bid-ask spread. Although precrash option prices conform to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012757777
Widespread violations of stochastic dominance by one-month Samp;P 500 index call options over 1986-2006 imply that a trader can improve expected utility by engaging in a zero-net-cost trade net of transaction costs and bid-ask spread. Although pre-crash option prices conform to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012758035