Showing 1 - 10 of 108
Justifiability is a name for a variety of well-documented behavioral phenomena that violate rational choices. For instance, preferences and choices frequently depend on payoff-irrelevant factors, and not only on the collection of alternatives. Motivated by these findings we present a generalized...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207901
Experimental evidence and field data suggest that agents hold two seemingly unrelated biases: failure to account for the fact that the behavior of others reflects their private information (“winner's curse”), and a tendency to value a good more once it is owned (“endowment effect”). In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011259069
We consider games with incomplete information a la Harsanyi, where the payoff of a player depends on an unknown state of nature as well as on the profile of chosen actions. As opposed to the standard model, players' preferences over state--contingent utility vectors are represented by arbitrary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011107395
We study the idea that seemingly unrelated behavioral biases can coevolve if they jointly compensate for the errors that any one of them would give rise to in isolation. We suggest that the "endowment effect" and the "winner's curse" could have jointly survived natural selection together. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011785717
This paper characterizes the optimal information structure in competitive insurance markets with adverse selection. A regulator assigns ratings to individuals according to their risk characteristics, insurers offer fixed insurance contracts to each rating group, and the market clears as in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011794192
We study the idea that seemingly unrelated behavioral biases can coevolve if they jointly compensate for the errors that any one of them would give rise to in isolation. We suggest that the "endowment effect" and the "winner's curse" could have jointly survived natural selection together. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011661133
This paper characterizes the optimal information structure in competitive insurance markets with adverse selection. A regulator assigns ratings to individuals according to their risk characteristics, insurers offer fixed insurance contracts to each rating group, and the market clears as in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011789043
This paper characterizes the optimal information structure in competitive insurance markets with adverse selection. A regulator assigns ratings to individuals according to their risk characteristics, insurers offer fixed insurance contracts to each rating group, and the market clears as in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012924981
This paper characterizes the optimal information structure in insurance markets in the presence of adverse selection. The optimal information structure minimizes ex-post risk subject to a participation constraint for insurees and a break-even constraint from insurers. In the unique optimal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012933060
We consider games with incomplete information a la Harsanyi, where the payoff of a player depends on an unknown state of nature as well as on the profile of chosen actions. As opposed to the standard model, players' preferences over state--contingent utility vectors are represented by arbitrary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014217141