Showing 1 - 10 of 122
Why do diverse groups outperform homogeneous groups in some settings, but not in others? We show that while diverse groups experience more frictions than homogeneous ones, they are also less conformist. Homogeneous groups minimize the risk of miscoordination, but they may get stuck in an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011545320
Why do diverse groups outperform homogeneous groups in some settings, but not in others? We show that while diverse groups experience more frictions than homogeneous ones, they are also less conformist. Homogeneous groups minimize the risk of miscoordination, but they may get stuck in an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011396777
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012314937
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012522760
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012588381
This paper presents a novel mechanism under which diversity affects performance even if it has no direct impact on payoffs. Diversity matters because it influences the degree of strategic uncertainty that players face. We model this by incorporating the dual process account of Theory of Mind...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014124277
We consider a dynamic matching problem where players are repeatedly assignedtasks and can choose whether to accept or reject them. Players prefer to avoidcertain tasks (“hot potatoes”) while other tasks give a positive payoff (“sweet pota-toes”). There are frictions in the matching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013236492
The value of a game is the payoff a player can expect from playing the game. Wecharacterize how the value of a coordination game depends on the economic environment.The central insight is that players face two types of coordination problems: (1) How tocoordinate on a Nash equilibrium (i.e.,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013236493
The standard framework for analyzing games with incomplete information models players as if they form beliefs about their opponents' beliefs about their opponents' beliefs and so on, that is, as if players have an infinite depth of reasoning. This strong assumption has nontrivial implications,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009534128
The standard framework for analyzing games with incomplete information models players as if they have an infinite depth of reasoning, which is not always consistent with experimental evidence. This paper generalizes the type spaces of Harsanyi (1967-1968) so that players can have a finite depth...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009782099