Showing 1 - 10 of 80
In this paper we present an experiment on the false consensus effect. Unlike previous experiments, we provide monetary incentives for revealing the actual estimation of others' behavior. In each session and round sixteen subjects make a choice between two options simultaneously. Then they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009581106
In this note we present an experiment to compare the two competing fairness theories by Bolton / Ockenfels and Fehr / Schmidt. For most experiments that these theories have previously been applied to, they make similar predictions so that it is difficult to compare their predictive accuracy. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009583893
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002494016
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001485453
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001413260
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001818327
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003647542
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003811388
A ranking of journals is manipulable if a particular journal's position can be improved by making additional citations to other journals. We introduce a simple ranking method that is not manipulable and is invariant to citation intensities, journal scaling and article-splitting. The ranking of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008668738
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003937551