Showing 1 - 10 of 796
This paper examines the practical usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, namely the Eigenfactor score, which may be interpreted as measuring “Journal Influence”, and the Article Influence score, using the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science (hereafter ISI) data for 2009 for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010326225
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two recent journal performance metrics, namely the Eigenfactor score, which may be interpreted as measuring “Journal Influence”, and the Article Influence score, using the Thomson Reuters ISI Web...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010326262
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008688818
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008688836
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008688840
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008689065
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003995686
The paper analyses the leading journals in Neurosciences using quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM), highlights the similarities and differences in alternative RAM, shows that several RAM capture similar performance characteristics of highly cited journals, and shows that some other...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008936160
This paper examines the practical usefulness of two new journal performance metrics, namely the Eigenfactor score, which is said to measure “importance”, and Article Influence score, which is said to measure “prestige”, using the most recent ISI data for 2009 for the 200 most highly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008839893
The paper is concerned with analysing what makes a great journal great in the sciences, based on quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM). Alternative RAM are discussed, with an emphasis on the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science database (hereafter ISI). Various ISI RAM that are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008840798