Showing 1 - 10 of 35
We analyze two mechanism designs for refunding emission payments to polluting firms; Output Based (OB) and Expenditure Based (EB) refunding. In both instruments, emissions fees are returned to the polluting industry, possibly making the policy more easily accepted by policymakers than a standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011968475
By using a choice experiment, this paper focuses on citizens' preferences for effort-sharing rules of how carbon abatement should be shared among countries. We find that Swedes do not rank the rule favoring their own country highest. Instead, they prefer the rule where all countries are allowed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010267104
We analyse two mechanism designs for refunding emission payments to polluting firms: output-based refunding (OBR) and expenditure-based refunding (EBR). In both instruments, emission fees are returned to the polluting industry, typically making the policy more politically acceptable than a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012269434
After twenty years of global negotiations, the world is still far from a comprehensive climate agreement. The 'top-down' approach embodied by the Kyoto Protocol has all but stalled, chiefly due to disagreements over levels of ambition and objections to financial transfers. To avoid those...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010398428
Using a choice experiment, we investigated preferences for distributing the economic burden of decreasing CO2 emissions in the two largest CO2-emitting countries: the United States and China. We asked respondents about their preferences for four burden-sharing rules to reduce CO2 emissions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010286457
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003774787
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003305209
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003795964
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003795968
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003892896