Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012235685
The paper deals with a one-shot prisoners' dilemma when the players have an option to go to court but cannot verify their testimonies. To solve the problem a second stage is added to a game. At the first stage the players are involved in the prisoners' dilemma and at the second stage they play...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012235849
A procedure for decision-making under risk is developed and axiomatized. It provides another explanation for the Allais paradox as well as justification for some other preference patterns that can not be represented by the expected utility model, but it includes expected utility representation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012235850
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000868173
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001173789
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000920161
A procedure for decision-making under risk is developed and axiomatized. It provides another explanation for the Allais paradox as well as justification for some other preference patterns that can not be represented by the expected utility model, but it includes expected utility representation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005824441
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005824563
The paper deals with a one-shot prisoners' dilemma when the players have an option to go to court but cannot verify their testimonies. To solve the problem a second stage is added to a game. At the first stage the players are involved in the prisoners' dilemma and at the second stage they play...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005824726
A semiorder can be thought of as a binary relation P for which there is a utility "u" representing it in the following sense: xPy iff u(x)-u(y) 1. We argue that weak orders (for which indifference is transitive) can not be considered a successful approximation of semiorders; for instance, a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596731